From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 07:21:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 07:21:24 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:59808 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 07:21:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 04:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020528.040524.117889173.davem@redhat.com> To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Cc: szepe@pinerecords.com, colin@gibbs.dhs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tcallawa@redhat.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, aurora-sparc-devel@linuxpower.org Subject: Re: 2.4 SRMMU bug revisited From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1022587118.4124.49.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alan Cox Date: 28 May 2002 12:58:38 +0100 Which is a concern since both Linus and Larry made it clear bitkeeper would *NEVER* be required of contributors. Is there nothing generating nightly tarballs off cron right now ? As stated in a followup posting, that kind of thing is available. I don't see why people fly off the handle on this. It only matters if you need the tree as of 5 minutes ago bleeding edge type stuff. If you can wait a few days, then just hang on for Marcelo's next prepatch.