From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 08:27:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 08:27:29 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:32929 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 May 2002 08:27:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 05:11:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020528.051134.58832375.davem@redhat.com> To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua Cc: szepe@pinerecords.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [aurora-sparc-devel] Re: 2.4 SRMMU bug revisited From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <200205281139.g4SBdSY22504@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Denis Vlasenko Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 14:41:20 -0200 But he wants some of "%99 of people with sparc32 problems" to move into "%1" category instead. Thank you, that is exactly what I meant. Look, if someone reports some bug once, that's ok. You report it twice, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you're merely reminding us. The third and further time, it's a whine. Everyone here knows there are sun4m problems, and Tom in particular knows it is a well known problem because I know he reads this list. Therefore Tom was engaging in what I'd like to term a double-whine.