mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com
Subject: Re: A reply on the RTLinux discussion.
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 12:12:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200205281612.g4SGC4t03662@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> said:
> AFAIK the patent doesn't give you the right to forbid anyone from
> using the technology, you only have a right to demand a compensation.
> If I am correct with this, you are possibly violating the GPL here.
> The binary module exception is an additional right granted to you by
> Linus, which you can't simply deny to others. The user space issue is
> even more clear, because that is clearly defined.

Actually, a patent does do exactly this.  A patent gives you a "negative" 
right to exclude anyone from using your patented method or process.  If you 
choose never to licence your patent (as is your right to do so) you block 
everyone else from making use of it.

In general, about the only restrictions on patents and their licensing 
arrangements in the US are the antitrust laws.  See:

http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/ipguide.htm

for a good guide from the horse's mouth.

This is an important debate but I think it's quality could be enhanced by 
increasing the level of well researched information and opinion.  A good 
starting point is `Benefits, Risks and Considerations in Using Open Licensed 
Software' written by a group of Intellectual Property lawyers and available 
freely on the internet:

http://www.whepatent.com/opensource.pdf

James Bottomley



             reply	other threads:[~2002-05-28 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-28 16:12 James Bottomley [this message]
2002-05-28 17:31 ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-28 18:03   ` James Bottomley
2002-05-28 21:21     ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-05-29  8:58       ` Peter Wächtler
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-29 12:36 Rose, Billy
2002-05-29 19:46 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-29 19:58   ` Mark Mielke
     [not found] <57.c083d0f.2a237c49@aol.com>
2002-05-27 12:36 ` RTAI/RtLinux Wolfgang Denk
2002-05-28 12:04   ` A reply on the RTLinux discussion yodaiken
2002-05-28 14:37     ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-28 15:57       ` Alan Cox
2002-05-28 15:11         ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-28 16:45           ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29  0:31             ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-29  1:34               ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-29  3:11                 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-05-29  8:53                   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-05-29 13:54                 ` Dana Lacoste
2002-05-29 15:17                   ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29 14:20                     ` Dana Lacoste
2002-05-29 15:15                       ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-29 17:43                         ` Dana Lacoste
2002-05-29 18:26                           ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-29 15:31                       ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29 15:45                       ` yodaiken
2002-05-29 17:40                         ` Dana Lacoste
2002-06-03 10:09                       ` Rob Landley
2002-05-29 13:24               ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29 13:43                 ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-29 14:59                   ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29 20:18                     ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-31 11:57                 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-31 21:34                   ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-31 23:19                   ` yodaiken
2002-05-28 15:19     ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-05-28 15:39       ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-28 16:00         ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-01 20:37       ` Michael Barabanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200205281612.g4SGC4t03662@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®