Re: missing bit from signal patches

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>]

Hi Roman,

On Thu, 30 May 2002 10:04:03 +0200 (CEST) Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2002, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > The following should allow the affected architectures to build in
> > 2.5.19 as currently there will be two definitions of
> > copy_siginfo_to_user.
> 
> There are other build problems. m68k doesn't compile, because siginfo_t is
> defined after the generic include and the inline functions in there access
> that structure. On the other hand I can't put the include after the
> definition, as it depends on other defines in the include.
> I worked around it with some ugly hacks, but a proper fix would be very
> welcome.

Is the following a more ugly hack than yours?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

diff -ruN 2.5.19-si/include/asm-generic/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.3/include/asm-generic/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19-si/include/asm-generic/siginfo.h	Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.3/include/asm-generic/siginfo.h	Thu May 30 22:04:54 2002
@@ -64,7 +64,11 @@
 	} _sifields;
 } siginfo_t;
 
-#endif
+#else /* HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T */
+
+struct siginfo;
+
+#endif /* HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T */
 
 /*
  * How these fields are to be accessed.