From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:10:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020604161001.K36@toy.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CFB2A38.60242CBA@opersys.com>
Hi!
> We have released the initial implementation of the Adeos nanokernel.
> The following is a complete description of its background, its
> implementation, its API, and its potential uses. Please also see the
> press release (http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/adeos/pr-2002-06-03.en.txt)
> and the project's workspace (http://freesoftware.fsf.org/projects/adeos/).
> The Adeos code is distributed under the GNU GPL.
Sounds interesting...
> Here are some of the possible uses for Adeos (this list is far
> from complete):
> 1) Much like User-Mode Linux, it should now be possible to have 2
> Linux kernels living side-by-side on the same hardware. In contrast
> to UML, this would not be 2 kernels one ontop of the other, but
> really side-by-side. Since Linux can be told at boot time to use
> only one portion of the available RAM, on a 128MB machine this
> would mean that the first could be made to use the 0-64MB space and
> the second would use the 64-128MB space. We realize that many
> modifications are required. Among other things, one of the 2 kernels
> will not need to conduct hardware initialization. Nevertheless, this
> possibility should be studied closer.
Also, unlike UML, kernels are not protected from each other.
> 2) It follows from #1 that adding other kernels beside Linux should
> be feasible. BSD is a prime candidate, but it would also be nice to
> see what virtualizers such as VMWare and Plex86 could do with Adeos.
> Proprietary operating systems could potentially also be accomodated.
So if your FreeBSD+Linux combination crashes, you do not know if Linux or
FreeBSD caused it.
> 5) Drivers who require absolute priority and dislike other kernel
> portions who use cli/sti can now create a domain of their own
> and place themselves before Linux in the ipipe. This provides a
> mechanism for the implementation of systems that can provide guaranteed
> realtime response.
This is same approach rtLinux takes, right?
Pavel
--
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-04 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-03 8:35 Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 8:46 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 8:56 ` Alessandro Rubini
2002-06-03 9:14 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 9:52 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:05 ` Alessandro Rubini
2002-06-03 10:12 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 10:33 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:38 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 11:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-03 9:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-04 19:29 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 2:40 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 13:51 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 14:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 15:37 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 17:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 18:06 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 18:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 19:13 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 19:40 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 20:51 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 21:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 21:22 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 21:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 8:52 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-06 10:58 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 14:03 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-06 16:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 20:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-06 8:34 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-08 13:50 ` john slee
2002-06-08 13:59 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-06 21:21 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-07 1:35 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 2:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 2:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 10:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 21:35 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-05 9:41 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-06-05 18:20 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 3:56 ` J Sloan
2002-06-05 4:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 7:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-05 11:15 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 12:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 11:11 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 16:55 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-04 16:10 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2002-06-04 19:59 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-04 21:53 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-04 23:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-05 4:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 9:24 Martin.Knoblauch
2002-06-05 19:01 Paul Zimmerman
2002-06-05 19:11 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 20:17 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020604161001.K36@toy.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=karim@opersys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®