From: Brad Hards <bhards@bigpond.net.au>
To: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
Cc: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
trivial@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [patch] i386 "General Options" - begone [take 2]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 09:11:20 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200206060911.20027.bhards@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59885C5E3098D511AD690002A5072D3C02AB7ED5@orsmsx111.jf.intel.com> <200206051134.24063.bhards@bigpond.net.au> <20020605122939.H5277@suse.de>
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:29, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:34:23AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> > One idea that comes to mind is putting the power management config
> > options in a "Power Management" section
>
> *nod* sounds sensible 8)
>
> > then PNPBIOS in with the other PnP stuff, and
> > so on (read: don't know were to put MPS yet, and don't know what $PIR is
> > :)
>
> It's an interrupt routing table.
>
> MPS and interrupt routing are both CPU related features, so the best
> place we currently have is under the CPU menu imho.
Is it fundamentally different _functionality_ to the stuff that is in "Plug
and Play configuration" (which makes devices automatically get the right
itnerrupts)? [ Ignore implementation for a second - we can always solve this
with another layer of abstraction. :-]
Of course, putting all this into the CPU menu (which is obviously a per-arch
config.in change) would make drivers/arch/acpi/Config.in look a lot cleaner.
I'll try to work with Andy Grover off-list with this, and come up with an
agreed position.
Rusty: This is starting to get a little non-trivial. Please drop the two
patches I've sent. I'll get back to you later.
Brad
--
http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in Black.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-05 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-04 20:59 Grover, Andrew
2002-06-04 21:20 ` Dave Jones
2002-06-05 1:34 ` Brad Hards
2002-06-05 10:29 ` Dave Jones
2002-06-05 23:11 ` Brad Hards [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-04 23:31 Grover, Andrew
2002-06-04 23:09 Grover, Andrew
2002-06-04 23:25 ` Dave Jones
2002-06-05 1:00 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-04 21:58 Grover, Andrew
2002-06-04 22:09 ` Dave Jones
2002-06-04 23:16 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-07 5:38 ` fchabaud
2002-06-03 1:56 Linux 2.5.20 Linus Torvalds
2002-06-03 3:18 ` [patch] i386 "General Options" - begone [take 2] Brad Hards
2002-06-03 22:42 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-04 14:09 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-04 22:05 ` Brad Hards
2002-06-02 5:16 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200206060911.20027.bhards@bigpond.net.au \
--to=bhards@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
--cc=davej@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trivial@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®