From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 13:57:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 13:57:57 -0400 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:64673 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 13:57:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 23:40:34 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: kernel list , ACPI mailing list Subject: device_suspend() / device_resume() on S1? Message-ID: <20020608214034.GA163@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! Should we do device_suspend / device_resume on acpi S1 transition? Con: It is not needed according to specs. Con: It is more complicated that way. Pro: Many buggy notebooks will probably need it. Pavel -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa