From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 11:19:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 11:19:22 -0400 Received: from 54.61.26.24.cfl.rr.com ([24.26.61.54]:60933 "HELO potatoho.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 11:19:21 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Chris Faherty To: Brad Hards , Subject: Re: Logitech Mouseman Dual Optical defaults to 400cpi Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 11:19:56 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: <20020608165243Z317422-22020+923@vger.kernel.org> <20020609002448Z317485-22020+1014@vger.kernel.org> <200206091807.11524.bhards@bigpond.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020609151922Z317623-22020+1197@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 09 June 2002 04:07 am, Brad Hards wrote: > Was that using Snoopy? I believe that's what it was called. The program was sniffusb 0.13. I had problems get later versions to work. Then I found a nice treatise on interpreting the log: http://www.toth.demon.co.uk/usb/reverse-0.2.txt > Any objections to me taking this to 2.4 and 2.5? Feel free. I wonder if MS Intellimouse 3.0 has the same resolution problem. AFAIK they use the same sensor. > This could have been handled by a blacklist table quirk. Any reason why > you chose to do it this way? How does the blacklist work? Originally I wanted to put the setting in mousedev but I wasn't sure how to access the usb_device from there. -- /* Chris Faherty */