From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 00:52:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 00:52:01 -0400 Received: from 54.61.26.24.cfl.rr.com ([24.26.61.54]:22020 "HELO potatoho.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 00:52:01 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Chris Faherty To: Vojtech Pavlik Subject: Re: Logitech Mouseman Dual Optical defaults to 400cpi Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 00:52:52 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020608165243Z317422-22020+923@vger.kernel.org> <200206101057.20259.bhards@bigpond.net.au> <20020610232637.A4589@ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020611045201Z316782-22020+2155@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 10 June 2002 05:26 pm, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > Intellimouse 1.0 uses Agilent HDNS-2000, 2.0 uses ADNS-2001, and 3.0 > uses a chip made by SGS Thompson, under a secret contract with Microsoft > that has only 400 dpi, but up to one meter per second maximal tracking > speed. Hmm interesting, that Microsoft has no 800dpi mouse. Glad I picked Logitech then. I assumed they were equivalent resolution since most reviews give the Intellimouse the nod, but I don't know how the heck a 400dpi can compete with a 800dpi. Running the Logitech @ 800 on a black surface, it's flawless. I just can't get it to fail a twitch test, despite having fewer pictures per second. I did notice it doing a little pixel dance one time on a blue pad, but it's not ever done that with my black vinyl surface. -- /* Chris Faherty */