From: Athanasius <Athanasius@miggy.org.uk>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel: request_module[net-pf-10]: fork failed, errno 11
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:42:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020611134225.GD13726@miggy.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020608094307.GA6522@miggy.org.uk> <21483.1023531725@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <20020609175414.GB13726@miggy.org.uk>
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 06:54:14PM +0100, Athanasius wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 08:22:05PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 10:43:07 +0100,
> > Athanasius <link@gurus.tf> wrote:
> > > I'm seeing a lot of:
> > >
> > > kernel: request_module[net-pf-10]: fork failed, errno 11
> [snip]
> >
> > That error is occurring before modprobe has run, long before it gets to
> > modules.conf. You need to find out why fork() for modprobe on your
> > system is failing with EAGAIN. Have you reached the limit on the
> > number of tasks?
>
> Not as far as I can tell. It would be easier to tell if 'sa' (BSD
> process accounting) carried useful information like timestamps per
> process or even just their PIDs (to match to a *.* syslog'd file).
Ok, a little more investigation:
root@bowl:/sbin# cat modprobe-logging
#!/bin/sh
echo "`date` `ps axh | wc -l`: $@" >> /var/log/modprobe.log
exec /sbin/modprobe $@
root@bowl:/sbin# cat /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe
/sbin/modprobe-logging
In /var/log/kern.log:
Jun 11 14:36:58 bowl kernel: request_module[net-pf-10]: fork failed, errno 11
And in /var/log/modprobe.log:
Tue Jun 11 14:36:41 BST 2002 229: -s -k -- net-pf-10
Tue Jun 11 14:36:58 BST 2002 228: -s -k -- net-pf-10
Tue Jun 11 14:36:58 BST 2002 227: -s -k -- net-pf-10
Tue Jun 11 14:37:02 BST 2002 227: -s -k -- net-pf-10
/proc/sys/kernel/threads-max is 4095.
So, nowhere near threads-max (if ps axh is a good test of that),
certainly not processes-wise. Yet at times the request_module is
failing anyway. It would seem that an immediate followup attempt works.
Yup, just had another instance:
Jun 11 14:40:11 bowl kernel: request_module[net-pf-10]: fork failed, errno 11
Tue Jun 11 14:40:07 BST 2002 235: -s -k -- net-pf-10
Tue Jun 11 14:40:11 BST 2002 229: -s -k -- net-pf-10
Tue Jun 11 14:40:11 BST 2002 230: -s -k -- net-pf-10
Tue Jun 11 14:40:42 BST 2002 227: -s -k -- net-pf-10
Note that ulimit -u is 256, but that's per login instance normally and
I'd not have thought a kernel thread goes through PAM anyway...
-Ath
--
- Athanasius = Athanasius(at)miggy.org.uk / http://www.clan-lovely.org/~athan/
Finger athan(at)fysh.org for PGP key
"And it's me who is my enemy. Me who beats me up.
Me who makes the monsters. Me who strips my confidence." Paula Cole - ME
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-11 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-08 9:43 Athanasius
2002-06-08 10:22 ` Keith Owens
2002-06-09 17:54 ` Athanasius
2002-06-11 13:42 ` Athanasius [this message]
2002-06-11 23:34 ` Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020611134225.GD13726@miggy.org.uk \
--to=athanasius@miggy.org.uk \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®