From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:39:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:39:13 -0400 Received: from [212.234.165.220] ([212.234.165.220]:25658 "EHLO poup.poupinou.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:39:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:39:40 +0200 To: Pavel Machek Cc: kernel list , ACPI mailing list Subject: Re: [ACPI] device_suspend() / device_resume() on S1? Message-ID: <20020611173940.GF18047@poup.poupinou.org> In-Reply-To: <20020608214034.GA163@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Ducrot Bruno Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 11:40:34PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > Should we do device_suspend / device_resume on acpi S1 transition? > > Con: It is not needed according to specs. > > Con: It is more complicated that way. > > Pro: Many buggy notebooks will probably need it. Pro: without it, my laptop didn't survive :) -- Ducrot Bruno http://www.poupinou.org Page profaissionelle http://toto.tu-me-saoules.com Haume page