From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 02:21:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 02:21:47 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:27152 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 02:21:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:21:34 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: LKML , rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, bjornw@axis.com, davidm@hpl.hp.com, paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org, engebret@us.ibm.com, jes@trained-monkey.org, ralf@gnu.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, davem@redhat.com, gniibe@m17n.org, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate include/asm/signal.h Message-ID: <20020618082134.A8287@wotan.suse.de> References: <20020618154726.1c78f6d1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020618154726.1c78f6d1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 03:47:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Have I gone too far this time? :-) Looks fine. > > This patch consolidates most of the common signal.h stuff between > architectures into include/asm-generic/signal.h. It builds fine > on i386, but may have broken all the other architectures despite > being careful. > > Please test (at least a build). builds on x86-64. -andi