From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:57:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:57:34 -0400 Received: from mail.zmailer.org ([62.240.94.4]:943 "EHLO mail.zmailer.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:57:34 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 22:57:34 +0300 From: Matti Aarnio To: William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Your message to Linux-kernel awaits moderator approval Message-ID: <20020622225734.I19520@mea-ext.zmailer.org> References: <20020621230700.23341.34513.Mailman@lcs-irva-002> <20020621231754.GC25360@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020621231754.GC25360@holomorphy.com>; from wli@holomorphy.com on Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 04:17:54PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Damn, why all weird questions creep up when I take couple days off.. (there is this sort of summer-solstice carneval we finns do...) On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 04:17:54PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 04:07:00PM -0700, linux-kernel-admin@anamail.broadcom.com wrote: > > Your mail to 'Linux-kernel' with the subject > > [BUG] floppy requests > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Posting to a restricted list by sender requires approval > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive > > notification of the moderator's decision. > > As linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org neither restricted nor administered from > broadcom.com last I checked perhaps someone should look into this. I don't see directly any linux-kernel@**broadcom.com address at the list. (We do have 64 of "^linux-kernel@" matching addresses in the linux-kernel list, though.) There are couple addresses at broadcom.com, but those addresses have a feeling of being individual people. > Matti, you've addressed some list-related issues in the past, if you've > got some way of knowing how to deal with this, I'd be much obliged. Well, I might get similar bounce for this reply, and I could try to decode it a bit. Nevertheless, I don't suggest holding your breath, asphyxiation does set in a bit too fast for my abilities to debug these things in the usual case ;-) > Thanks, > Bill /Matti Aarnio