mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Paul Menage <pmenage@ensim.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
	torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-fsdevel@ensim.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Shift BKL into ->statfs()
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 13:28:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020703132848.M27706@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E17Pf1Q-0004ip-00@pmenage-dt.ensim.com>; from pmenage@ensim.com on Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 12:57:56AM -0700

On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 12:57:56AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> All ->statfs() implementations have been modified to take the BKL,
> except for the following:
> 
> - those that don't reference any external mutable data:

... also adfs_statfs, 

> - those that already have their own locking:

... also affs_statfs, bfs_statfs, ext3_statfs, hfs_statfs, jffs2_statfs,
jfs_statfs

I think ufs_statfs needs lock_super() due to its handling of fragments.

qnx4 looks terribly broken for read-write anyway... probably just keep the
lock_kernel / unlock_kernel around the call to qnx4_count_free_blocks().

I haven't audited coda, hpfs, jffs, nfs, smbfs & udf.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-03 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-03  1:25 Paul Menage
2002-07-03  2:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-07-03  3:04   ` Paul Menage
2002-07-03  6:07   ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-03  6:25 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-03  7:57   ` Paul Menage
2002-07-03 12:28     ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2002-07-03  9:55   ` Oleg Drokin
2002-07-03 10:34   ` Anton Altaparmakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020703132848.M27706@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --to=willy@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@ensim.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmenage@ensim.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®