From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:11:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:10:30 -0400 Received: from mail.clsp.jhu.edu ([128.220.34.27]:26347 "EHLO mail.clsp.jhu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:09:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 05:03:00 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Alan Cox Cc: John Alvord , Thunder from the hill , Pablo Fischer , Mark Hahn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: StackPages errors (CALLTRACE) Message-ID: <20020709030259.GA113@elf.ucw.cz> References: <83ubiu433pkcf41ev9ihl7mgo0tn1kokcc@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > There has also been a patch on L-K which implments CMOV on prior-PPro > > processors. john > > It has a hideous overhead. Just dont use cmov blindly in kernels. The kernel > stuff will take care not to let the compiler stick cmov instructions into > a non ppro+ kernel Not only nasty overhead but potential nasty implications. You get exception where you'd normaly get simple instruction. Do NOT use cmov emulation for kernel. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?