mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@e-mind.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: O_DIRECT handling introduced a race in F_SETFL
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:29:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020710112936.GW8878@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020705141934.GI7734@dualathlon.random>

On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 04:19:34PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 07:30:19PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > 
> > I was doing some random kernel janitoring, pushing the BKL down a
> > little bit, when I noticed O_DIRECT introduced a race.  If alloc_kiovec
> > sleeps, we will effectively be unprotected by the BKL.  This would
> > allow two processes sharing an fd both changing the FASYNC flag to
> > call f_op->fasync() the wrong number of times and potentially leave
> > the application erroneously believing that fasync is off when it is on,
> > or vice versa.
> > 
> > My patch below fixes this problem by allocating the O_DIRECT kiovec
> > before taking the BKL.  Any comments?  Also, should we be freeing the
> > kiovec when removing the O_DIRECT attribute from the filp?
> > 
> > diff -urNX dontdiff linux-2.5.24/fs/fcntl.c linux-2.5.24-mm/fs/fcntl.c
> > --- linux-2.5.24/fs/fcntl.c	Sun Jun  9 06:09:49 2002
> > +++ linux-2.5.24-mm/fs/fcntl.c	Tue Jul  2 10:55:29 2002
> > @@ -235,24 +235,11 @@
> >  	if (!(arg & O_APPEND) && IS_APPEND(inode))
> >  		return -EPERM;
> >  
> > -	/* Did FASYNC state change? */
> > -	if ((arg ^ filp->f_flags) & FASYNC) {
> > -		if (filp->f_op && filp->f_op->fasync) {
> > -			error = filp->f_op->fasync(fd, filp, (arg & FASYNC) != 0);
> > -			if (error < 0)
> > -				return error;
> > -		}
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	if (arg & O_DIRECT) {
> >  		/*
> > -		 * alloc_kiovec() can sleep and we are only serialized by
> > -		 * the big kernel lock here, so abuse the i_sem to serialize
> > -		 * this case too. We of course wouldn't need to go deep down
> > -		 * to the inode layer, we could stay at the file layer, but
> > -		 * we don't want to pay for the memory of a semaphore in each
> > -		 * file structure too and we use the inode semaphore that we just
> > -		 * pay for anyways.
> > +		 * alloc_kiovec() can sleep, so abuse the i_sem to serialize
> > +		 * this case too.  Note we have to do this before we take the
> > +		 * BKL otherwise we have a race if it sleeps.
> >  		 */
> >  		error = 0;
> >  		down(&inode->i_sem);
> > @@ -263,13 +250,26 @@
> >  			return error;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	lock_kernel();
> > +	/* Did FASYNC state change? */
> > +	if ((arg ^ filp->f_flags) & FASYNC) {
> > +		if (filp->f_op && filp->f_op->fasync) {
> > +			error = filp->f_op->fasync(fd, filp, (arg & FASYNC) != 0);
> > +			if (error < 0)
> > +				goto out;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/* required for strict SunOS emulation */
> >  	if (O_NONBLOCK != O_NDELAY)
> >  	       if (arg & O_NDELAY)
> >  		   arg |= O_NONBLOCK;
> >  
> >  	filp->f_flags = (arg & SETFL_MASK) | (filp->f_flags & ~SETFL_MASK);
> > -	return 0;
> > +	error = 0;
> > + out:
> > +	unlock_kernel();
> > +	return error;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static long do_fcntl(unsigned int fd, unsigned int cmd,
> > @@ -295,9 +295,7 @@
> >  			err = filp->f_flags;
> >  			break;
> >  		case F_SETFL:
> > -			lock_kernel();
> >  			err = setfl(fd, filp, arg);
> > -			unlock_kernel();
> >  			break;
> >  		case F_GETLK:
> >  			err = fcntl_getlk(filp, (struct flock *) arg);
> 
> that's correct. Also moving the if (arg & O_DIRECT) {} right after
> setting filp->f_flags would fix the race, that wouldn't require the move
> the locking to the setfl, but I guess moving the locking down was your
> object since the first place :). Please post it for mainline inclusion
> too.
> 


this one from -aa fixes fasync too. Please review, thanks.

--- odirect/fs/fcntl.c.~1~	Fri Jul  5 12:20:47 2002
+++ odirect/fs/fcntl.c	Sat Jul  6 18:53:56 2002
@@ -213,32 +213,29 @@ static int setfl(int fd, struct file * f
 	if (!(arg & O_APPEND) && IS_APPEND(inode))
 		return -EPERM;
 
+	/*
+	 * alloc_kiovec() and ->fasync can sleep, so abuse the i_sem
+	 * to serialize against parallel setfl on the same filp,
+	 * to avoid races with ->f_flags and ->f_iobuf.
+	 */
+	down(&inode->i_sem);
 	/* Did FASYNC state change? */
 	if ((arg ^ filp->f_flags) & FASYNC) {
 		if (filp->f_op && filp->f_op->fasync) {
+			lock_kernel();
 			error = filp->f_op->fasync(fd, filp, (arg & FASYNC) != 0);
+			unlock_kernel();
 			if (error < 0)
-				return error;
+				goto out;
 		}
 	}
 
 	if (arg & O_DIRECT) {
-		/*
-		 * alloc_kiovec() can sleep and we are only serialized by
-		 * the big kernel lock here, so abuse the i_sem to serialize
-		 * this case too. We of course wouldn't need to go deep down
-		 * to the inode layer, we could stay at the file layer, but
-		 * we don't want to pay for the memory of a semaphore in each
-		 * file structure too and we use the inode semaphore that we just
-		 * pay for anyways.
-		 */
-		error = 0;
-		down(&inode->i_sem);
-		if (!filp->f_iobuf)
+		if (!filp->f_iobuf) {
 			error = alloc_kiovec(1, &filp->f_iobuf);
-		up(&inode->i_sem);
-		if (error < 0)
-			return error;
+			if (error < 0)
+				goto out;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* required for strict SunOS emulation */
@@ -247,7 +244,10 @@ static int setfl(int fd, struct file * f
 		   arg |= O_NONBLOCK;
 
 	filp->f_flags = (arg & SETFL_MASK) | (filp->f_flags & ~SETFL_MASK);
-	return 0;
+	error = 0;
+ out:
+	up(&inode->i_sem);
+	return error;
 }
 
 static long do_fcntl(unsigned int fd, unsigned int cmd,
@@ -273,9 +273,7 @@ static long do_fcntl(unsigned int fd, un
 			err = filp->f_flags;
 			break;
 		case F_SETFL:
-			lock_kernel();
 			err = setfl(fd, filp, arg);
-			unlock_kernel();
 			break;
 		case F_GETLK:
 			err = fcntl_getlk(fd, (struct flock *) arg);

Andrea

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-10 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-02 18:30 Matthew Wilcox
2002-07-05 14:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-10 11:29   ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2002-07-11 21:24     ` Marcus Alanen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020710112936.GW8878@dualathlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=andrea@e-mind.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®