From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:24:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:24:10 -0400 Received: from 12-231-243-94.client.attbi.com ([12.231.243.94]:21519 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:24:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:26:13 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "David S. Miller" Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Removal of pci_find_* in 2.5 Message-ID: <20020716002613.GB32431@kroah.com> References: <20020713.135235.83621938.davem@redhat.com> <20020713134553.4483@192.168.4.1> <20020714.222527.57270686.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020714.222527.57270686.davem@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.21 (i586) Reply-By: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:22:35 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:25:27PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:45:53 +0200 > > That case shouldn't be a problem, since when your device get discovered, > hopefully, the host controller is already there. Though in some cases, > host controllers just appear as a sibling device, and in this specific > case, it may be not have been "discovered" yet. > > THat's not what I'm concerned about, what I care about is that there > still will be a pci_find_*() I can call to see if DEV/ID is on > the bus. That is the easiest way to perform that search right > now. Yes, it will stay. It is needed for situations just like these, and lots of other valid reasons. thanks, greg k-h