From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S317544AbSGTWOD>; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 18:14:03 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S317547AbSGTWOD>; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 18:14:03 -0400
Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([212.71.160.16]:56074 "EHLO
	louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S317544AbSGTWOD>; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 18:14:03 -0400
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 00:17:03 +0200
From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Impressions of IDE 98?
Message-ID: <20020720221703.GE12637@louise.pinerecords.com>
References: <20020720212553.GA12637@louise.pinerecords.com> <Pine.SOL.4.30.0207202329530.22207-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.30.0207202329530.22207-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-OS: GNU/Linux 2.4.19-pre10/sparc SMP
X-Uptime: 46 days, 12:53
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> > I'm wondering, why haven't IDE 99 and IDE 100 been posted on lkml?
> >
> Ask Martin, I don't know.

Right. I'm puzzled here.

How safe does Martin think people will suppose the patches are if they were
not meant to be reviewed in the standard lkml manner? Given the problems
with 2.5.25 (and 'problems' would be an euphemism here) I'd expect to see
something like a 'safer coding' approach, not 'stealth operations.'

T.