mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@work.bitmover.com>,
	Roger Gammans <roger@computer-surgery.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: using bitkeeper to backport subsystems?
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:16:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020723081615.GB1176@marowsky-bree.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020722154443.E19057@work.bitmover.com>

On 2002-07-22T15:44:43,
   Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> said:

> > With all due respect to Larry and the bk team, I think you'll
> > find determining 'needed changesets' in this case is a _hard_ problem.
> Thanks, we agree completely.  It's actually an impossible problem
> for a program since it requires semantic knowledge of the content
> under revision control. 

So, another option would be to have the developer define explicit dependencies
for his changesets, but I fear that might prove to cumbersome, too.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>

-- 
Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me.
	--- Gregory F. Pfister


  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-23  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-21 23:34 Andreas Schuldei
2002-07-22  7:15 ` Val Henson
2002-07-22  8:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-22 10:27     ` Andreas Schuldei
2002-07-22 10:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-22 15:25         ` Larry McVoy
2002-07-25 21:48           ` Andreas Schuldei
2002-07-22 15:20       ` Tom Rini
2002-07-22 22:29         ` Roger Gammans
2002-07-22 22:44           ` Larry McVoy
2002-07-23  8:16             ` Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2002-07-23 18:38             ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-07-23 22:46               ` Larry McVoy
2002-07-22 10:43     ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-22 10:46       ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-22 11:02         ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-22 11:03           ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-22 13:45         ` Mark Mielke
2002-07-22 13:48           ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-22 17:52     ` Val Henson
2002-07-23 14:31 Matthias Urlichs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020723081615.GB1176@marowsky-bree.de \
    --to=lmb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm@work.bitmover.com \
    --cc=roger@computer-surgery.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®