From: zhengchuanbo <zhengcb@netpower.com.cn>
To: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@yahoo.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: about the performance of netfilter
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 22:38:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200207242241526.SM00796@zhengcb> (raw)
i applied the NAPI patch. this did improved the performance. but i wonder if it is stable because it's new to me.
i used tc to apply the trffic control. that's a little complicated. and i have not tried policy routing. anyway that's a good idea adn i'll try latter.
i still wish there could be some way to simplify netfilter and improve the perform.
zhengchuanbo
zhengcb@netpower.com.cn
>On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 09:24:56PM +0800, zhengchuanbo wrote:
>> we use a linux router. i just tested the performance of the router. when the kernel is build without netfilter support,the throughput of 64bytes frame is about 45%. when i build the kernel with netfilter (only the ip_filter module),the throughput dropped to 24%, without any rules.
>> so is there some way to improve the performance? i just want some simple packet filter. is netfilter no so good on the performance compare to ipchains due to the improved functionality?
>> please cc. thanks.
>
>If (1) your needs are simple, and (2) netfilter can't handle the throughput,
>then you can consider using the traffic control and policy routing features
>of the kernel in conbination with the u32 classifier.
>
>this requires extremely low-level bit manipulation (perhaps tcng provides
>a better interface?), but can probably hit very high throughput numbers for
>simple filtering tasks.
>
>Also, are you using the NAPI patches? If not, get them and apply them.
>[search the last month of lkml for "napi".]
>
>regards,
>
> bill rugolsky
reply other threads:[~2002-07-24 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200207242241526.SM00796@zhengcb \
--to=zhengcb@netpower.com.cn \
--cc=brugolsky@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®