mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
	Linux SCSI list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sd_many done right (1/5)
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 02:42:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020728004235.GA7691@nbkurt.etpnet.phys.tue.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020727104119.A5992@infradead.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1372 bytes --]

Hi Christoph, Al,

On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 10:41:19AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 12:32:24AM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> Linus wants this, and he stated that again on the kernel summit.  

I've not been there :-(

> But to do this porperly (= not the EVMS way) it needs preparation.  
> Al currently does lots of work in that area to make the block drivers
> largely independent of the major number.

So he should port my sd patch to 2.5. All the data it uses is in a per-major
data structure. Currently, in most function it uses the kdev_t passed to find
the right pointer. But that's very easy to replace.
Of course, sd still assumes it gets a whole major and not parts of one. Other-
wise, more splitting would be needed.

> Once the drivers don't need the major number anymore
> internally the only that needs sorting out is userlevel backwards-compatinlity.

That takes more effort than the change itself, I guess.

> I'm pretty sure the preparation will be finished for 2.6, also I can't comment
> whether the unified disk major will be done. (Al?)

Would certainly be nice.

Regards,
-- 
Kurt Garloff  <garloff@suse.de>                          Eindhoven, NL
GPG key: See mail header, key servers         Linux kernel development
SuSE Linux AG, Nuernberg, DE                            SCSI, Security

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-28  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-26 15:45 Kurt Garloff
2002-07-26 16:45 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-26 16:54   ` Kurt Garloff
2002-07-26 17:50     ` Andreas Dilger
2002-07-26 17:55       ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-26 22:32         ` Kurt Garloff
2002-07-27  9:41           ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-28  0:42             ` Kurt Garloff [this message]
2002-07-26 23:28     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020728004235.GA7691@nbkurt.etpnet.phys.tue.nl \
    --to=garloff@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®