From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:17:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:17:48 -0400 Received: from [210.78.134.243] ([210.78.134.243]:48906 "EHLO 210.78.134.243") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:17:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:22:58 +0800 From: zhengchuanbo To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: can the driver e100 be applied in 2.4? X-mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200207291425517.SM00792@zhengcb> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org in linux2.5 there is a new driver e100 to replace eepro100. is e100 better than eepro100 in performance such as throughput? and can the driver e100 be applied in 2.4? please cc. thanks. regards, chuanbo zheng zhengcb@netpower.com.cn