From: Geoffrey Lee <snailtalk@linux-mandrake.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: bind()/connect() to port 0 question for tcp/udp
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:31:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020730133116.GA17743@anakin.wychk.org> (raw)
Hi list,
I want to ask a question:
In sockets, what is the correct behavior when we try to connect() to port 0
for tcp / udp?
It seems that FreeBSD returns EADDRNOTAVAIL, as does Solaris.
So something like this will fail on Solaris and FreeBSD:
[...]
saddr.sin_port = htons(0);
[...]
connect(AF_INET, (struct sockaddr *)&saddr, sizeof(struct sockaddr));
We don't do this however, and Linux will merrily accept a port of 0 in
a connect(), though most probably your connect() wouldn't succeed.
Making it return EADDRNOTAVAIL to user space would be a trivial task, so
I want to ask, is this a buglet in the Linux implementation, or is FreeBSD
and Solaris wrong?
- G.
reply other threads:[~2002-07-30 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020730133116.GA17743@anakin.wychk.org \
--to=snailtalk@linux-mandrake.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®