mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, thunger@ngforever.de, vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pdc20265 problem.
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:39:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208071839.LAA08673@adam.yggdrasil.com> (raw)

On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 10:47, Alan Cox wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 08:54, Adam J. Richter wrote:
>>       Linux users in the "I'm not a sysadmin" crowd (?) probably
>> don't care about the scan order of the pdc20265 IDE controller,
>> but people in the "I'm a sysadmin, not a programmer" crowd
>> may have legitimiate reasons to.
>
>The non sysadmin people care that is has not change, and generally
>prefer that its the same ordering as windows seems to use. Once you go
>to modular IDE it gets trickier. Certainly if you load modules the usual
>bets are off (as with scsi)
[...]

And Petr Vandrovec wrote:
| But such "I'm not a sysadmin" people will be very surprised that their
| promise was IDE2 in 2.2.x, it was IDE2 in 2.4.18, it is IDE2 in 2.5.30,
| and now - oops - it is IDE0 in 2.4.19. Broken, I'd say.

	I was not expresing an opinion on what the default
ordering should be.

	There seemed to be agreement that no single ordering would
make all users happy and that there should be some way of changing
the ordering.  The post that I replied to discussed and module
arguments versus a compile time flag.  All that I was saying was
that providing arguments would probably be more useful for the
population that might care about this issue, as they might not be
comfortable having to rebuild custom kernels (or supporting another
kernel in their site, I should add now).

I might as well address the response from "Thunder from the hill" as well;
: Oh, that's really no problem. You can reduce the programm to choosing a 
: simple list entry and clicking a button. Anything can be made easy via the 
: proper frontend. (And BTW, one should always be both - (sys|net)admin and 
: "programmer".)

	That would require the distribution provider to double
the number of precompiled kernels or module trees that they ship
and support.  That would be a lot more work than implementing a
module option and a boot option and use a lot more space, for no
substatial advantages that I'm aware of.

Adam J. Richter     __     ______________   575 Oroville Road
adam@yggdrasil.com     \ /                  Milpitas, California 95035
+1 408 309-6081         | g g d r a s i l   United States of America
                         "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."

             reply	other threads:[~2002-08-07 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-07 18:39 Adam J. Richter [this message]
2002-08-07 19:33 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-07 21:11   ` Alan Cox
2002-08-07 20:02     ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-07 23:40       ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-08 18:22 Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-08 18:35 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-08-09  6:47   ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-08-12  1:24     ` Andre Hedrick
2002-08-08 16:48 Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-08 17:30 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-08-08 12:45 Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-08 13:02 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-08-07 10:20 Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-07 23:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-07  7:54 Adam J. Richter
2002-08-07 11:41 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-07 23:08   ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-08 10:49     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-08-07 16:32 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-06 10:28 Petr Vandrovec
2002-08-02 19:05 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-08-02 23:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-08-03  0:55   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-08-03  0:08     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-08-03  1:22     ` Nick Orlov
2002-08-03 13:41       ` Alan Cox
2002-08-06  3:48     ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-06  4:33       ` Nick Orlov
2002-08-07  3:09         ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-07  3:56           ` Nick Orlov
2002-08-07 18:30             ` Andre Hedrick
2002-08-07 20:27               ` Tomas Szepe
2002-08-07 22:46             ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-08 10:50               ` Andre Hedrick
2002-08-08 17:42                 ` Nick Orlov
2002-08-08 18:02                   ` Andre Hedrick
2002-08-09  6:44                     ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-08-12  1:37                       ` Andre Hedrick
2002-08-09 17:16                 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-01  6:38 Linux v2.4.19-rc5 Marcelo Tosatti
2002-08-02  1:47 ` [PATCH] pdc20265 problem Nick Orlov
2002-08-02  2:29   ` Nick Orlov
2002-08-02 12:27   ` Alan Cox
2002-08-02 12:52     ` Nick Orlov
2002-08-02 14:00       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-08-02 14:45         ` Nick Orlov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200208071839.LAA08673@adam.yggdrasil.com \
    --to=adam@yggdrasil.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thunger@ngforever.de \
    --cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®