From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 09:13:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 09:13:07 -0400 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:64265 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 09:13:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:16:43 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Johan Martensson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jom@virrvarr.com Subject: Re: 2.4.19 Oops :Unable to handle kernel paging request Message-ID: <20020809141643.A10534@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Johan Martensson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jom@virrvarr.com References: <20020809132447.A9306@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from a0087901@levonline.com on Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 03:10:47PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 03:10:47PM +0200, Johan Martensson wrote: > I did. But when looking at the Oops output it seems to me that it is > get_free_page() that fails. If that is correct then it shouldn't matter > wether the call was made from grsecurity, should it? I thought > get_free_page would be succesful as long as I have free memory in > the system. get_free_page() is free to fail whenever it wants.