From: Studying MTD <studying_mtd@yahoo.com>
To: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at page_alloc.c
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 17:41:51 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020812004151.479.qmail@web40301.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020812002223.GE24456@louise.pinerecords.com>
I have noticed that difference in 2.4.1 and 2.5.25 is
:-
(2.4.1)
if (BAD_RANGE(zone,page))
BUG();
DEBUG_ADD_PAGE
(2.2.25)
if (bad_range(zone, page))
BUG();
prep_new_page(page);
prep_new_page(page) is replaced with DEBUG_ADD_PAGE
and prep_newpage is :-
/*
* This page is about to be returned from the page
allocator
*/
static inline void prep_new_page(struct page *page)
{
BUG_ON(page->mapping);
BUG_ON(PagePrivate(page));
BUG_ON(PageLocked(page));
BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
BUG_ON(PageActive(page));
BUG_ON(PageDirty(page));
BUG_ON(PageWriteback(page));
page->flags &= ~(1 << PG_uptodate | 1 <<
PG_error |
1 << PG_referenced | 1 <<
PG_arch_1 |
1 << PG_checked);
set_page_count(page, 1);
}
vs
#define DEBUG_ADD_PAGE \
if (PageActive(page) || PageInactiveDirty(page) || \
PageInactiveClean(page)) BUG();
Can i also replace DEBUG_ADD_PAGE with prep_new_page
in 2.4.1. Is it OK ?
Thank you very much for your help.
--- Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> wrote:
> > I am using 2.4.1 on SH4 and using only 32 MB RAM
> > without hard-disk, so only thing i am using is 32
> MB
> > RAM .
>
> Could you try a more recent kernel?
> 2.4.1 is now almost 2 years old.
>
> T.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-12 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020812002223.GE24456@louise.pinerecords.com>
2002-08-12 0:27 ` Studying MTD
2002-08-12 0:41 ` Studying MTD [this message]
2002-08-12 0:46 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-09-15 12:25 Marcin Rożek
2004-09-15 11:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-15 13:33 ` Marcin Rożek
2004-09-15 12:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-17 11:02 ` Marcin Rożek
[not found] <20020812000523.15F1D88BC@oscar.casa.dyndns.org>
2002-08-12 0:19 ` Studying MTD
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-11 23:35 Studying MTD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020812004151.479.qmail@web40301.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=studying_mtd@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=szepe@pinerecords.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome