Re: [patch] __func__ -> __FUNCTION__

[Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@actcom.co.il>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1361 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:09:39AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> >
> >How about: 
> >
> >/* early gcc compilers lose on __func__ */ 
> >#ifndef __func__ 
> >#define __func__ __FUNCTION__
> >#endif /* !defined __func__ */ 
> 
> __func__ isn't a macro; it's a compiler token.

Works for me(TM). 

mulix@alhambra:~/tmp$ cat foo.c
#include <stdio.h>

#if DEF_FUNC
#ifndef __func__
#define __func__ __FUNCTION__
#endif /* !defined __func__ */
#endif /* DEF_FUNC */ 

int main()
{
	printf("%s\n", __func__); 
	return 0; 
}
mulix@alhambra:~/tmp$ /usr/bin/gcc -v
Reading specs from
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
mulix@alhambra:~/tmp$ /usr/bin/gcc foo.c -DDEF_FUNC=0 -o foo
foo.c: In function `main':
foo.c:11: `__func__' undeclared (first use in this function)
foo.c:11: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
foo.c:11: for each function it appears in.)
mulix@alhambra:~/tmp$ /usr/bin/gcc foo.c -DDEF_FUNC=1 -o foo
mulix@alhambra:~/tmp$ ./foo

ObCompleteyUnrelatedQuestions: where can I find klibc? 
-- 
"Hmm.. Cache shrink failed - time to kill something?
 Mhwahahhaha! This is the part I really like. Giggle."
					 -- linux/mm/vmscan.c
http://vipe.technion.ac.il/~mulix/	http://syscalltrack.sf.net

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]