From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q disable irqbalance
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:30:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020813233007.GV14394@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200208131729.50127.habanero@us.ibm.com>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 05:29:50PM -0500, Andrew Theurer wrote:
> > 2.4.19-rc3aa3:
> >
> > No Balance Ingo IRQ Balance Andrea IRQ Balance
> > 794 Mbps 787 Mbps 792 Mbps
> >
> > With hyperthreading:
> >
> > No Balance Ingo IRQ Balance Andrea IRQ Balance
> > 773 Mbps 798 Mbps 809 Mbps
thanks again for running the above benchmarks.
> version is a little less aggressive and has less overhead, something I'd
> prefer in 2.5.
Second that of course, btw, the detailed explanataion of the changes I
did while merging it can be found on lse-tech.
it is also possible HZ/50 is too high frequency still, I didn't run any
extensive test on the reprogramming frequency. I would suggest to try
with HZ/10 too (so every 100msec instead of every 20msec).
BTW, the very same algorithm should also be shared by alpha, alpha never
had hardware irq balancing support, it's like a p4, and we do static
routing distribution choosed by the kernel at boot which is been pretty
good so far (better than mainline 2.4 on a p4 smp) but the irqblanace
algorithm should be better there too.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-13 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-05 23:51 Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 16:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 16:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 16:57 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 17:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 17:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 17:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 17:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 18:02 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 18:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 20:04 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 20:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-14 5:52 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-14 10:10 ` Jos Hulzink
2002-08-14 11:12 ` David Lang
2002-08-13 20:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 20:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 20:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 20:42 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 21:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 22:29 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-08-13 23:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2002-08-14 21:16 ` James Cleverdon
2002-08-23 2:31 ` [PATCH] 2.5.31 Summit NUMA patch with dynamic IRQ balancing James Cleverdon
2002-08-20 0:49 ` [PATCH] NUMA-Q disable irqbalance Dave Hansen
2002-08-13 22:08 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-13 22:14 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-14 14:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-14 15:19 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-24 12:19 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-08-27 1:23 ` James Cleverdon
2002-08-27 7:46 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020813233007.GV14394@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=habanero@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®