From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:54:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:54:03 -0400 Received: from pc-62-30-255-50-az.blueyonder.co.uk ([62.30.255.50]:42714 "EHLO kushida.apsleyroad.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:54:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:57:09 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Rogier Wolff , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH Message-ID: <20020814205709.E26404@kushida.apsleyroad.org> References: <3D56B13A.D3F741D1@zip.com.au> <20020814194019.A31761@bitwizard.nl> <3D5AB250.3070104@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3D5AB250.3070104@zytor.com>; from hpa@zytor.com on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:41:04PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Yes. This is a gcc-specific wart, a bad idea from the start, and > apparently one which has caught up with them to the point that they've > had to abandon it. It's still there in GCC 3.1. -- Jamie