From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 09:18:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 09:18:03 -0400 Received: from capsi.xs4all.nl ([213.84.61.91]:63245 "HELO capsi.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 09:18:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 15:22:01 +0200 From: Alexander Kellett To: "Adam J. Richter" Cc: B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IDE? Message-ID: <20020817132201.GA3556@ezri.capsi> Mail-Followup-To: "Adam J. Richter" , B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200208171302.GAA07962@adam.yggdrasil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208171302.GAA07962@adam.yggdrasil.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent those of KDE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [shortening cc:'s as they are probably not interested in me :) ] On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 06:02:16AM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote: > I'd be quite relieved if we could convince Bartlomiej to > adopt Martin's tree and continue with Martin's tree as at least > a configuration option. Couldn't agree more here. Although I usually hate -like me too posts. I think that its really quite important for the state of the ide layer that the work thats already gone into it isn't lost. IMO this is not something that you can see a positive, or as a lesson learned. This to me just seems like a lot of hard work going down the drain. So, pleeease Bartlomiej/Alan/Jens, whoever. Someone step up to get most/some of Marcin' cleanup patches into 2.5 again. Alex