From: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
To: Dax Kelson <dax@gurulabs.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Does Solaris really scale this well?
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 21:27:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020817182715.GC32427@mea-ext.zmailer.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208171151190.4792-100000@mooru.gurulabs.com>
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 11:53:16AM -0600, Dax Kelson wrote:
> From:
> http://www.itworld.com/Man/3828/020816mcnealy/
>
> Scott McNealy:
>
> "When you take a 99-way UltraSPARC III machine and add a 100th processor,
> you get 94 percent linear scalability. You can't get 94 percent linear
> scalability on your first Intel chip. It's very, very hard to do, and they
> have not done it."
Conditionally... I would like to know the exact architecture,
and the problem set running in the system to say.
When you have noncc-NUMA, you have a Beowulf-like setup.
when you have cc-NUMA ("cc" = cache coherent), things get
truly hairy...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-17 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-17 13:02 IDE? Adam J. Richter
2002-08-17 13:22 ` IDE? Alexander Kellett
2002-08-17 17:37 ` IDE? Andre Hedrick
2002-08-17 17:53 ` Does Solaris really scale this well? Dax Kelson
2002-08-17 18:27 ` Matti Aarnio [this message]
2002-08-17 23:03 ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2002-08-18 0:55 ` Larry McVoy
2002-08-18 8:35 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-18 10:28 ` venom
2002-08-18 12:33 ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2002-08-19 13:42 ` Does Solaris really scale this well? [OT] Dana Lacoste
2002-08-18 1:46 ` Does Solaris really scale this well? venom
2002-08-17 19:51 ` IDE? Alan Cox
2002-08-18 12:43 ` IDE? Alexander Kellett
2002-08-17 18:26 ` IDE? Andreas Dilger
2002-08-19 9:54 ` IDE? Vojtech Pavlik
[not found] <15713.30718.950168.358907@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>
2002-08-20 10:13 ` Does Solaris really scale this well? venom
2002-08-20 12:13 ` Jakob Oestergaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020817182715.GC32427@mea-ext.zmailer.org \
--to=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=dax@gurulabs.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®