From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 06:22:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 06:22:40 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:62882 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 06:22:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 03:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020824.030632.48428103.davem@redhat.com> To: szepe@pinerecords.com Cc: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aurora-sparc-devel@linuxpower.org Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.20-pre4 sparc32 fixup From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020824095004.GW14278@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20020824093304.GU14278@louise.pinerecords.com> <20020824.021937.60281893.davem@redhat.com> <20020824095004.GW14278@louise.pinerecords.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Tomas Szepe Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 11:50:04 +0200 > I told you I applied this to my tree already. Why are you resending it? You must be confusing the patch for something else, I wrote it like 30 minutes ago. Aha, no I'm confusing it for a nearly identical patch posted by rob@osinvestor.com last week. It does exactly what your patch does, and I do mean precisely. :-)