mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Subject: Re: VM changes added to performance patches for 2.4.19
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:53:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208272224.36373.m.c.p@gmx.net> (raw)

Hi Bill,

> ...
> against my current production kernel, 2.4.19-ac4. Machine in Athlon
> 1400MHz, 1GB RAM, 20+30GB WD disks.
> ...
> Then I did my nightly backup of a scanned documentation project, making a
> CD image from the scans, currently ~570MB. I was on ck3-aa, and I said
> "self, that seemed pretty fast!" So I rebooted cold and tried the mkisofs
> with both kernels, twice each.

>                         2.4.19-ac4              2.4.19-ck3-aa
> mkisofs 570MB           2:05                    1:14


with WOLK v3.6 and only ONE harddisk drive:

root@codeman:[/] # du -skh /home
605M    /home
root@codeman:[/] # find /home|wc -l
   7384
root@codeman:[/] # time mkisofs -o /delme.iso -allow-multidot -iso-level 3 -J 
-max-iso9660-filenames -U -R /home
...

real    1m12.872s
user    0m1.840s
sys     0m10.800s


with one big file:

root@codeman:[/] # du -skh /home/onebigfile.delme
620M    /home
root@codeman:[/] # time mkisofs -o /delme.iso -allow-multidot -iso-level 3 -J 
-max-iso9660-filenames -U -R /home/onebigfile.delme
...

real    0m35.676s
user    0m1.180s
sys     0m10.740s

:-)

Anyway, I also tested the patchset from Con, both, with -aa VM and -rmap VM 
and I must say, -rmap is much slower than -aa VM.


Testmashine: Celeron 800MHz
             256MB RAM
             1x Seagate 30GB running in UDMA4 (ATA66) mode
             Filesystem: ext3, data=ordered

I think with your mashine this could be a bit faster also ;)

-- 
Kind regards
        Marc-Christian Petersen

http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk

PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16
Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16
Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.



             reply	other threads:[~2002-08-27 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-27 20:53 Marc-Christian Petersen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-24  6:33 conman
2002-08-24  8:38 ` Dag Nygren
2002-08-24 14:03 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-24 14:36   ` conman
2002-08-24 14:54     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-27 23:02     ` Cliff White
2002-08-27 18:32 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-01 11:32 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-01 12:16   ` Con Kolivas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200208272224.36373.m.c.p@gmx.net \
    --to=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®