mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis@latnet.lv>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Sawinski <juergen.sawinski@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.20-pre4-ac1: i810_audio broken
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:59:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208281859.38609.pavenis@latnet.lv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020828112133.C30777@redhat.com>

On Wednesday 28 August 2002 18:21, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:22:30PM +0300, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 August 2002 15:51, Juergen Sawinski wrote:
> > > Can you drop in the old (working) source into the new tree and see if
> > > that works? If that works I'll try making a step by step patch series,
> > > to see what breaks it.
> >
> > Today's tests were done in that way (I only replaced i810_audio.c,
> > removed i810_audio.o, run 'make modules' and 'make modules_install' and
> > tested the results). As I wrote earlier it seems that Dough's patch (to
> > 2.4.20-pre1-ac2) broke driver
>
> (In an email Juergen sent to me privately he mentioned that on the ICH4
> the CIV register is now read-only where as on previous ICH chips it was
> read-write, which is something I missed as far as changes to the chip are
> concerned)
>
> Now, given the tidbit of information above, I would expect ICH4 chipsets
> to break with the driver.  We currently rely upon the ability to set the
> CIV register to what we want in order to start the DMA where we want.  If
> that's now readonly, I'll have to rethink how I reset the DMA hardware and
> how I will have to start recording the new DMA position instead of setting
> the new DMA position.  The one thing about this though, I would expect
> this issue to cause previously non-working ICH4 chips to work poorly with
> my patch instead of previously working ICH4 chips to now start working
> poorly since my patch didn't change the (/me stops mid-sentence and
> realizes that "yes, in fact there is a change in my patch to base DMA
> operations that could cause this").  Hmmm...backup....try backing out my
> changes to stop_dac and stop_adc (the part where I change how we do a DMA
> engine reset every time we stop the dac and adc) and see if that solves
> your problem.  The changes to __stop_dac() and __stop_adc() are localized
> actually and you should be able to safely leave all of those hunks out
> without effecting the rest of the patch.

Tried, it helps for i810_audio.c both from 2.4.20-pre1-ac2 and 
2.4.20-pre4-ac1. (Patch simply to be sure we're talking about the
same thing). In both cases I put i810_audio.c in 2.4.20-pre4-ac1 source
tree.

Andris

--- i810_audio.c-2.4.20-pre1-ac2	2002-08-28 09:50:44.000000000 +0300
+++ i810_audio.c	2002-08-28 18:51:34.000000000 +0300
@@ -732,8 +732,6 @@
 	outb(0, card->iobase + PI_CR);
 	// wait for the card to acknowledge shutdown
 	while( inb(card->iobase + PI_CR) != 0 ) ;
-	// reset the dma engine now
-	outb(0x02, card->iobase + PI_CR);
 	// now clear any latent interrupt bits (like the halt bit)
 	if(card->pci_id == PCI_DEVICE_ID_SI_7012)
 		outb( inb(card->iobase + PI_PICB), card->iobase + PI_PICB );
@@ -784,8 +782,6 @@
 	outb(0, card->iobase + PO_CR);
 	// wait for the card to acknowledge shutdown
 	while( inb(card->iobase + PO_CR) != 0 ) ;
-	// reset the dma engine now
-	outb(0x02, card->iobase + PO_CR);
 	// now clear any latent interrupt bits (like the halt bit)
 	if(card->pci_id == PCI_DEVICE_ID_SI_7012)
 		outb( inb(card->iobase + PO_PICB), card->iobase + PO_PICB );

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-08-28 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-27  9:53 Andris Pavenis
2002-08-27 18:46 ` Doug Ledford
2002-08-28  0:21   ` Juergen Sawinski
2002-08-28  0:30     ` Juergen Sawinski
2002-08-28  7:04   ` Andris Pavenis
2002-08-28 12:51     ` Juergen Sawinski
2002-08-28 13:22       ` Andris Pavenis
2002-08-28 15:21         ` Doug Ledford
2002-08-28 15:47           ` Juergen Sawinski
2002-08-28 16:07             ` Doug Ledford
2002-08-28 15:59           ` Andris Pavenis [this message]
2002-08-28 16:12             ` Doug Ledford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200208281859.38609.pavenis@latnet.lv \
    --to=pavenis@latnet.lv \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=juergen.sawinski@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®