From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:08:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:08:02 -0400 Received: from [62.70.77.106] ([62.70.77.106]:63398 "EHLO mail.pronto.tv") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:08:02 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk Organization: ProntoTV AS Subject: 2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:14:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 To: Kernel mailing list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200208291314.11638.roy@karlsbakk.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org hi all David S. Miller tells me here that '2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 2.4.19 anyways' is this correct? ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: e1000/2.4 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:42:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "David S. Miller" To: roy@karlsbakk.net If you get "a patch" it almost certainly won't build because the e1000 driver in 2.4.20-preX depends upon the NAPI stuff we added to the 2.4.x tree 2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 2.4.19 anyways :-) ------------------------------------------------------- -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/ Tel: +47 9801 3356 Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.