From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ptrace-fix-2.5.33-A1
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 18:52:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020905225257.GB14295@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209060021360.14643-100000@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:25:32AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > this splitup of the lists makes it possible for the debugger to do a wait4
> > > that will get events from the debugged task, and for the debugged task to
> > > also be available to the real parent.
> >
> > Great. I'm not exactly sure on how this works right now: sys_wait4 only
> > iterates over ->children, with the exception of the special code in
> > TASK_ZOMBIE. I'm not quite sure when events from a traced process get
> > to the normal parent of that process, or when they're supposed to.
>
> i'm not sure about this either. What happens if an (untraced) parent has
> traced and untraced children, and does a wait4. Would it confuse the
> debugger if the parent could get one of the traced tasks as a result in
> wait4? And how does the debugger solve this problem?
Not a problem. The parent never gets an event that is not first
reported to the debugger, via the hook in sys_wait4... A debugger that
runs other processes has to play some games with wait loops in order to
manage its children and its debugees, but that's old news.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-05 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-05 22:09 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 22:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 22:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 22:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 22:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 22:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 22:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-06 15:27 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-09-06 15:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-06 15:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-06 20:44 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-09-05 22:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 22:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-09-05 22:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 23:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 23:08 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-05 22:10 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 15:35 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 17:08 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-09-05 18:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 20:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-05 21:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020905225257.GB14295@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®