From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com
Subject: Re: [2.5] DAC960
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:17:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209181617.g8IGHgp03871@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
> > > Linus indicated at the Kernel Summit that he'd like to see a
> > > cleaned-up scsi midlayer used as framework for *all* disk IO,
> > > including IDE. Obviously, what with IDE transitions and whatnot, we
> > > are far from being ready to attempt that, so see "nursing along"
> > > above. There's no longer any chance that a generic disk midlayer is
> > > going to happen in this cycle, as far as I can see. Still, anybody
> > > who is interested would do well by studing the issues, and fixing
> > > broken drivers certainly qualifies as a way to come up to speed.
> > > First of all, I believe Linus' plan is to push more functionality into
> > the block layer.
>
> I distinctly heard him say he wanted the scsi mid layer repurposed as
> an interface for all disks. Maybe he changed his mind?
I don't recall hearing this. I remember his agreeing with the idea of
slimming down the SCSI mid layer, which does rather contradict the use SCSI
for everything approach.
After the Kernel Summit, there was quite a long thread on l-k with Joerg
Schilling on exactly this issue. The upshot of which was I clearly said we
weren't going to go the SCSI is everything route. Unless there's any reason
to change course, I think that's the current plan.
James
next reply other threads:[~2002-09-18 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-18 16:17 James Bottomley [this message]
2002-09-18 16:40 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-23 19:23 Dave Olien
2002-09-10 5:30 Samium Gromoff
2002-09-10 6:20 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-10 16:16 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-15 4:21 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-15 13:19 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-15 15:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-15 16:18 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-16 20:13 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-16 20:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-16 22:08 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-16 22:25 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-19 18:49 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-19 19:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-19 22:09 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-19 22:21 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-20 6:21 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-20 21:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-19 21:25 ` Dave Olien
2002-09-20 6:20 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-15 15:14 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-15 16:20 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200209181617.g8IGHgp03871@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@arcor.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome