mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com
Subject: Re: [2.5] DAC960
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:17:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209181617.g8IGHgp03871@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

> > > Linus indicated at the Kernel Summit that he'd like to see a
> > > cleaned-up scsi midlayer used as framework for *all* disk IO,
> > > including IDE.  Obviously, what with IDE transitions and whatnot, we
> > > are far from being ready to attempt that, so see "nursing along"
> > > above.  There's no longer any chance that a generic disk midlayer is
> > > going to happen in this cycle, as far as I can see.  Still, anybody
> > > who is interested would do well by studing the issues, and fixing
> > > broken drivers certainly qualifies as a way to come up to speed.
> > > First of all, I believe Linus' plan is to push more functionality into
> > the block layer.
>
> I distinctly heard him say he wanted the scsi mid layer repurposed as
> an interface for all disks.  Maybe he changed his mind?

I don't recall hearing this.  I remember his agreeing with the idea of 
slimming down the SCSI mid layer, which does rather contradict the use SCSI 
for everything approach.

After the Kernel Summit, there was quite a long thread on l-k with Joerg 
Schilling on exactly this issue.  The upshot of which was I clearly said we 
weren't going to go the SCSI is everything route.  Unless there's any reason 
to change course, I think that's the current plan.

James



             reply	other threads:[~2002-09-18 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-18 16:17 James Bottomley [this message]
2002-09-18 16:40 ` Daniel Phillips
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-23 19:23 Dave Olien
2002-09-10  5:30 Samium Gromoff
2002-09-10  6:20 ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-10 16:16   ` Dave Olien
2002-09-15  4:21   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-15 13:19     ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-15 15:23       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-15 16:18         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-16 20:13       ` Dave Olien
2002-09-16 20:26         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-16 22:08           ` Dave Olien
2002-09-16 22:25             ` Dave Olien
2002-09-19 18:49           ` Dave Olien
2002-09-19 19:16             ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-19 22:09               ` Dave Olien
2002-09-19 22:21                 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-20  6:21                   ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-20 21:32                 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-19 21:25           ` Dave Olien
2002-09-20  6:20             ` Jens Axboe
2002-09-15 15:14     ` Alan Cox
2002-09-15 16:20       ` Daniel Phillips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200209181617.g8IGHgp03871@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillips@arcor.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome