From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 03:41:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 03:41:27 -0400 Received: from web13302.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.175.38]:12552 "HELO web13302.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 03:41:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20020920074631.13390.qmail@web13302.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 09:46:31 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Joerg=20Pommnitz?= Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > They started and waited for 100,000 threads. > > They did not have them all running at the same time. I think the > original post said something like "up to 50 at a time". To quote Ulrich: "Even on IA-32 with its limited address space and memory handling running 100,000 concurrent threads was no problem at all, creating and destroying the threads did not take more than two seconds." It clearly states 100,000 CONCURRENT threads. So, it really seems to work (not that I have the hardware to verify this claim). Regards Jörg ===== -- Regards Joerg __________________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Möchten Sie mit einem Gruß antworten? http://grusskarten.yahoo.de