From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:35:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:35:53 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:64200 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:35:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:41:04 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.38-mm3 with contest 0.37 Message-ID: <20020927144104.GB15101@suse.de> References: <1033043594.3d92fe8a8dd82@kolivas.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1033043594.3d92fe8a8dd82@kolivas.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 26 2002, Con Kolivas wrote: > io_load: > Kernel Time CPU Ratio > 2.4.19 170.06 45% 2.36 > 2.5.38 283.27 28% 3.92 > 2.5.38-mm2 106 75% 1.47* > 2.5.38-mm3 95.9 84% 1.33* this is encouraging to see, 2.5.38-mm3 has the new deadline io scheduler and it appears to be performing well here too. I'm especially looking forward to 2.5.38 vs 2.5.39 too, as 2.5.39 will have some deadline updates that are not in -mm3. -- Jens Axboe