From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Swsusp updates, do not thrash ide disk on suspend
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:09:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021002130933.GA18829@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10210011827551.3976-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
Hi!
> > > > This cleans up swsusp a little bit and fixes ide disk corruption on
> > > > suspend/resume. Please apply,
> > >
> > > It also seems to be doing things with the device manager. Mind explaining
> > > those changes too?
> >
> > Those are forward port of what we had there already. I make IDE child
> > of PCI device with the controller (in cases its on PCI). That seems
> > logical place for it and we had it like that in 2.5.30 or
> > so. ide-disk.c is there to make disk sleep before we go
> > suspend. Without that, data corruption happens.
>
> I pointed out to you various other device other than disk support
> DMA, and
Well, if even this patch is hard to push through, how hard would it be
to push patch that touches also cdroms etc?
> moving the suspend point up to the mainloop away from the
> subdrivers.
Are you trying to say that you believe that idedisk_suspend could be
same as idecdrom_suspend and idefloppy_suspend?
> This would insure the entire sub-system is out. Why are we block
~~~~~~ do you mean ensure?
> after
> the request has been sent to the sub-driver?
We are not block. Certainly *I* am not block ;-). Do you mean "why do
we block"? Which "block" do you have in mind?
> Why do you see this the
> preferred location and not before it enters the system? Given that you
> have stated it does not parse the difference between S3 v/s S4, I am
> graveful concerned.
What problem do you have with no difference between S3 and S4?
Pavel
--
Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building,
cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-02 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-01 22:24 Pavel Machek
2002-10-01 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-01 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-02 1:35 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-10-02 13:09 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2002-10-02 11:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-02 11:53 ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-02 13:42 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021002130933.GA18829@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®