From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:01:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021002140124.B2141@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1033513407.12959.91.camel@phantasy>; from rml@tech9.net on Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 07:03:28PM -0400
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 07:03:28PM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> The following patch implements set_cpus_allowed() for stock 2.4 without
> the O(1) scheduler.
>
> The calling semantics and behavior remain the same as 2.5's method.
>
> This is to provide a backward-compatible interface, specifically for
> those interested in back-porting the new workqueue code to 2.4 -
> set_cpus_allowed() seems to be the only nit preventing a straight
> drop-in.
>
> Patch is against 2.4.20-pre8 and untested but does compile.
Patch looks good to me, and I'd really like to have it in XFS :)
BTW, now that you have the core functionality I wonder why you don't
also add the cpu affinity syscalls..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-02 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-01 23:03 Robert Love
2002-10-02 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2002-10-02 15:00 ` Robert Love
2002-11-05 3:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-06 15:32 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-11-07 21:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 17:12 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-12-03 0:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 17:47 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-12-02 19:10 ` Robert Love
2002-12-03 0:26 Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 17:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-02 18:57 ` Robert Love
2002-12-03 0:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 17:50 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-02 18:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-12-02 19:12 ` Robert Love
2002-12-02 19:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-02 19:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-12-03 20:49 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-03 21:09 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-04 0:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-12-04 0:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-12-04 0:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-04 0:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-12-04 1:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-04 9:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-04 1:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-04 1:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-12-04 2:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-06 18:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-08 13:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-12-08 19:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-09 20:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-12-03 1:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 18:59 ` Robert Love
2002-12-02 22:47 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-02 22:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-02 22:41 ` Robert Love
2002-12-07 16:55 ` bill davidsen
2002-12-09 3:02 Jim Houston
2002-12-09 20:19 kernel
2002-12-13 23:08 Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-13 21:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-12-14 4:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021002140124.B2141@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®