From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:34:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:34:39 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:14034 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:34:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 06:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20021003.063256.84377325.davem@redhat.com> To: linux_4ever@yahoo.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.40 - remove IPV6_ADDRFORM From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20021003133634.9670.qmail@web9605.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20021003.054332.22032944.davem@redhat.com> <20021003133634.9670.qmail@web9605.mail.yahoo.com> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Steve G Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 06:36:34 -0700 (PDT) >Also, if you are going to fix the indentation in >the header file, please do so in a seperate patch. Hmmm, I only wanted to renumber the options since #1 was removed. Sorry if it changed the alignment. Don't do that, then every one of those ipv6 options you change which are being used by userspace breaks. What made you think such a change would be legal?