From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Start of cleaning up socket ioctls
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:42:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021003174207.I28586@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1033658599.28850.5.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:23:19PM +0100
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:23:19PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Nice but one request - can you call the protocol handlers first and if
> they return -ENOTTY then call the default ones provided by the upper
> layer. That will let you remove even more common code to most versions,
> make it work like the serial and other layers do, and still let people
> override defaults
I'm trying to tread as lightly as possible at first. I wasn't sure
how well this kind of cleanup would be received ;-) The trouble with
doing what you've asked immediately is that not all ->ioctl methods
return -ENOTTY. Some return -EINVAL, some return -EOPNOTSUPP and some
return -ENOPKG. Yeah, this should probably get cleaned up, but baby
steps first. I have no Grand Plan here, but I do want to make things
a little more understandable before I embark on anything bigger.
--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-03 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-03 14:52 Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-03 14:52 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 15:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-03 15:11 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-03 16:42 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021003174207.I28586@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=willy@debian.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®