From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:07:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:07:36 -0400 Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.80]:61863 "EHLO mailout01.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:07:35 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Andreas Pfaller To: Trond Myklebust , Alan Cox Subject: Re: linux-2.4.20-pre8-ac3: NFS performance regression Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 01:15:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200210032024.47664.apfaller@yahoo.com.au> <1033683184.28814.35.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Cc: lkml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200210040115.13878.apfaller@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 04 October 2002 00:50, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >>>>> " " == Alan Cox writes: > > On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 19:32, Andreas Pfaller wrote: > > > >> However I noticed a significant NFS performance drop with > >> 2.4.20-pre8-ac3. Other network throughput is not affected. > >> > > I see this with all recent 2.4.20pre and 2.4.20pre-ac > > kernels. I've not had time to retest with Trond's fixes to > > recheck it all > > FYI, here is the 'fix' Alan is talking about. It could be worth > trying... That 'fix' is already included in 2.4.20-pre8-ac3. Cheers, Andreas