From: Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Subject: O(1) Scheduler from Ingo vs. O(1) Scheduler from Robert
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:33:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210041531.51913.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> (raw)
Hi there,
say, can anyone explain me why $subject patches are so different?
What exactly are the important differences, what patch should we use?
--
Kind regards
Marc-Christian Petersen
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk
PGP/GnuPG Key: 1024D/569DE2E3DB441A16
Fingerprint: 3469 0CF8 CA7E 0042 7824 080A 569D E2E3 DB44 1A16
Key available at www.keyserver.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
next reply other threads:[~2002-10-04 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-04 13:33 Marc-Christian Petersen [this message]
2002-10-04 15:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-04 15:15 ` Robert Love
2002-10-04 15:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-04 19:28 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200210041531.51913.m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
--to=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®