From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:07:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:07:19 -0400 Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.83]:41960 "EHLO mailout07.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:07:18 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 19:12:45 +0200 From: Patrick.Mau@t-online.de (Patrick Mau) To: Linux Kernel Subject: 2.5.40 (BK of today) vmstat SIGSEGV after reading /proc/stat Message-ID: <20021005171245.GA3060@oscar.dorf.de> Reply-To: Patrick Mau Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hallo List, The BK tree of today changed the data returned in /proc/stat. A 'vmstat -n 10' immediatly segfaults after reading ... open("/proc/stat", O_RDONLY) = 6 read(6, "cpu 404408 506514 8240 154301 1"..., 4095) = 714 close(6) = 0 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) --- +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++ I'll try to prove a diff between 2.4.18 and BK current later this evening ... cheers, Patrick