mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chris@wirex.com>
To: Tony Glader <Tony.Glader@blueberrysolutions.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chris@wirex.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: capable()-function
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:08:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021009120819.A25392@figure1.int.wirex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210092135240.411-100000@blueberrysolutions.com>; from Tony.Glader@blueberrysolutions.com on Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:39:18PM +0300

* Tony Glader (Tony.Glader@blueberrysolutions.com) wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Chris Wright wrote:
> 
> > > I was investigating problems with PCMCIA and found that
> > > capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) returns always false in my case. If I'm calling
> > Typically root has all effective capabilities (except CAP_SETPCAP).
> > You can check your effective capabilities in /proc/[pid]/status.
> 
> In this case capable() call has been made from a kernel module. I think a
> module doesn't have a PID? Should I check capabilites of program that does
> a ioctl() call that will cause module to do capable() checking?

The userspace task that called the ioctl() is the one to look at.

> Process that does ioctl() call is owned by root and has following 
> capabilities:
> 
> CapInh: 0000000000000000
> CapPrm: 00000000fffffeff
> CapEff: 00000000fffffeff

Ok, I don't think the capable() check is failing.
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-09 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-09  7:51 capable()-function Tony Glader
2002-10-09 18:22 ` capable()-function Chris Wright
2002-10-09 18:39   ` capable()-function Tony Glader
2002-10-09 19:08     ` Chris Wright [this message]
2002-10-09 19:19       ` capable()-function Tony Glader
2002-10-09 19:16         ` capable()-function Chris Wright
2002-10-09 20:16           ` capable()-function Tony Glader

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021009120819.A25392@figure1.int.wirex.com \
    --to=chris@wirex.com \
    --cc=Tony.Glader@blueberrysolutions.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®