mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chris@wirex.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.41 capget fix
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:47:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021010144715.A30806@figure1.int.wirex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210101235290.2750-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:36:29PM -0700

* Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com) wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Chris Wright wrote:
> > 
> > Daniel Jacobowitz noticed that sys_capget is not behaving properly when
> > called with pid of 0.  It is supposed to return current capabilities,
> > not those of swapper.  Also cleaned up some duplicate code from a merge
> > error.  Patch is tested, please apply.
> 
> This is not correct. You drop the tasklist_lock before you actually set 
> read the capabilities, which means that by the time you read them, the 
> task you looked up may not be there any more.

Doh...feeling dumb...

The patch below fixes my oversight.  The locking is left the way it was,
and just the pid 0 part is fixed as well as the duplicate code removed.
This still applies against bk-curr and I tested it on 2.5.41.

thanks,
-chris

--- 2.5.41/kernel/capability.c	Sun Sep 15 12:19:29 2002
+++ 2.4.41-capget/kernel/capability.c	Thu Oct 10 14:36:29 2002
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
      int ret = 0;
      pid_t pid;
      __u32 version;
-     task_t *target;
+     task_t *target = current;
      struct __user_cap_data_struct data;
 
      if (get_user(version, &header->version))
@@ -54,15 +54,14 @@
      spin_lock(&task_capability_lock);
      read_lock(&tasklist_lock); 
 
-     target = find_task_by_pid(pid);
-     if (!target) {
-          ret = -ESRCH;
-          goto out;
+     if (pid && pid != current->pid) {
+	     target = find_task_by_pid(pid);
+	     if (!target) {
+	          ret = -ESRCH;
+	          goto out;
+	     }
      }
 
-     data.permitted = cap_t(target->cap_permitted);
-     data.inheritable = cap_t(target->cap_inheritable); 
-     data.effective = cap_t(target->cap_effective);
      ret = security_ops->capget(target, &data.effective, &data.inheritable, &data.permitted);
 
 out:

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-10 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-10  0:15 Chris Wright
2002-10-10 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-10 21:47   ` Chris Wright [this message]
2002-10-12  2:58     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-19 21:14       ` [PATCH] sys_capget should use current if the pid argument is 0 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-11-20  0:55         ` Chris Wright
2002-11-20  2:49           ` [PATCH] remove duplicated assignment from sys_capget Chris Wright

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021010144715.A30806@figure1.int.wirex.com \
    --to=chris@wirex.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome