From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:02:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:02:07 -0400 Received: from blowme.phunnypharm.org ([65.207.35.140]:40967 "EHLO blowme.phunnypharm.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:02:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:07:47 -0400 From: Ben Collins To: Erik Andersen , linux-kernel , linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] ieee1394 hotplug SCSI interaction 2.4.20-pre10 Message-ID: <20021010230747.GC26771@phunnypharm.org> References: <20021010223700.GA26348@codepoet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021010223700.GA26348@codepoet.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > When I posted my earlier effort to the linux1394-devel list: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=949390&forum_id=5389 > it was decided that the change to the SCSI subsystem needed to > expose scsi_add_single_device() and scsi_remove_single_device() > was not desirable. I'll leave the decision on that to others. Never said it wasn't desirable per se, just that if Marcelo doesn't accept that patch, then we can't make use of it. If you feel so strongly about it, then send that portion of the patch to Marcelo for 2.4.20 or 2.4.21. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/