mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.43-mm2 with contest
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 20:56:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210172056.45002.conman@kolivas.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DAE6E63.EFAF0F80@digeo.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 6:01 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Here are the updated benchmarks with contest v0.51
> > (http://contest.kolivas.net) showing the change from -mm1 to -mm2. Other
> > results removed for clarity.
> >
> > noload:
> > Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> > 2.4.18 [3]              71.8    93      0       0       1.01
> > 2.5.43 [2]              74.6    92      0       0       1.04
> > 2.5.43-mm1 [4]          74.9    93      0       0       1.05
> > 2.5.43-mm2 [2]          73.4    93      0       0       1.03
>
> Would be interesting to run
>
> 	blockdev --setra 1024 /dev/hdXX
>
> here.  We're getting more idle time with 2.5 and that can only
> be due to disk wait - the IO scheduler changes.  This might make a
> small difference.

Well that isn't it (b is with ra 1024):

2.5.43-mm2 [2]          73.4    93      0       0       1.03
2.5.43-mm2b [3]         76.4    94      0       0       1.07

>
> > ...
> > Removal of per-cpu pages patch does not seem to have been detrimental to
> > contest benchmarks at least - perhaps this is responsible for the noload
> > being better now?
>
> Well that code is still there.  I'd expect a very small benefit from it
> in this testing.

Sorry. Misunderstood your announce message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9rpdrF6dfvkL3i1gRAu5AAJ9B3LJ3kuplNHdhJGsW785CJ2i4GgCfRs9W
d2BW4cSQaanL/FjJTu3gU9k=
=+Foh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


      reply	other threads:[~2002-10-17 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-17  7:40 Con Kolivas
2002-10-17  8:01 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-17 10:56   ` Con Kolivas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200210172056.45002.conman@kolivas.net \
    --to=conman@kolivas.net \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®